Taylor v Attorney General

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1975
Year1975
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
87 cases
  • Independent Publishing Company Ltd v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago and another; Trinidad and Tobago News Centre Ltd and Others v Same
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 8 June 2004
    ...not engaged in those proceedings as parties or their legal representatives or as witnesses. The Court of Appeal of New Zealand in Taylor v Attorney General [1975] 2 NZLR 675 was clearly of opinion that a court had power to make an explicit order directed to and binding on the public ipso j......
  • Billes v ITL Corporation
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 10 May 2001
    ...437. (6) R. v. ClementENR(1821), 4 B. & Ald. 218; 106 E.R. 918. (7) R. v. Poulson, [1974] Crim. L.R. 141n. (8) Taylor v. Att.-Gen., [1975] 2 NZLR 675, followed. Civil Procedure-stay of proceedings-related Cayman proceedings-applicant for stay of civil action to show real risk of prejudice i......
  • Siemer v The Solicitor-General
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 July 2013
    ...the Supreme Court Act 2003 to continue the proceeding to judgment. 1 As they were described by Woodhouse J in Taylor v Attorney-General [1975] 2 NZLR 675 (CA) at 2 See Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine Ltd [1979] AC 440 (HL) at 467–468 per Lord Russell. 3 In force at the relevant time b......
  • Siemer v The Solicitor-General
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 11 May 2012
    ...2010. 3 The Solicitor-General of New Zealand v Siemer HC Wellington CIV-2010-404-8559, 2 September 2011. 4 Taylor v Attorney-General [1975] 2 NZLR 675 (CA). 5 R v B, above n 2. 6 Crimes Act 1961, s 361D. 7 At [5]. 8 The Solicitor-General of New Zealand v Siemer, above n 1. 9 At [69]. 10 At ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Open justice and suppressing evidence of police methods: the positions in Canada and Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...Zealand High Court as possessing an inherent power to make non-publication orders that bind the public and the media: Taylor v A-G (NZ) [1975] 2 NZLR 675, 678-9 (Wild CJ), 684 (Richmond J); Muir v Commissioner for Inland Revenue [2004] NZCA 277 (Unreported, McGrath, Hammond J and William Yo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT