Television New Zealand v Quinn
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
34 cases
-
The Gleaner Company Ltd and another v Abrahams
...Langrin JJA did not think that any rational assistance could be obtained from them. Similar views were expressed by McKay J in Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn [1996] 3 NZLR 24, 47 and the Irish Supreme Court in Proinsias de Rossa v Independent Newspapers plc [1999] 4 IR 62 The appellant......
-
Lillie v Newcastle City Council
...reflects the fact that qualified privilege is not a licence to be irresponsible: see McKay J in Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn [1996] 3 N.Z.L.R. 24, 45”. 15531293. Mr Bishop argues that this exposition of the law has no application in England. He submits that it is inconsistent with Eng......
-
Proinsias de Rossa v Independent Newspapers Plc
...523. Sutcliffe v. Pressdram Ltd. [1991] 1 Q.B. 153; [1990] 2 W.L.R. 271; [1990] 1 All E.R. 269. Television New Zealand Ltd. v. Quinn [1996] 3 N.Z.L.R. 24. Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. United Kingdom (1995) 20 E.H.R.R. 442. Uren v. John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd. (1966) 117 C.L.R. 118. Ward v. James ......
-
Craig v Slater
...decision of the Supreme Court does not alter the principle expressed: Craig v Williams, above n 4. 93 Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn [1996] 3 NZLR 24 (CA); and Television New Zealand Ltd v Ah Koy [2002] 2 NZLR 616 94 Costs judgment, above n 6, at [45]. 95 At [47]–[48]. 96 At [52]–[53]. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Durie v Gardiner: Public Libel Law and Stare Non Decisis
...(NZ) Limited vHolloway[1960] NZLR 69, 83 (CA); Hyams vPeterson [1991] 3 NZLR648, 657 (CA); Television New Zealand Limited vQuinn [1996] 3 NZLR 24, 38 (CA). Besidesavoidingfree expression theorising, the Cour t of Appeal has demonstrated a consistent bias againstthe institutional press.6 See......