Wellington Standards Committee v Sawyer

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2013] NZLCDT 47
Citation[2013] NZLCDT 47
Year2013
Date11 November 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Legal Complaints Review Officer v Morrison
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 27 November 2018
    ...NZLCDT 60. 7 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Parshotam [2016] NZLCDT 15. 8 Wellington Standards Committees No. 1 and No. 2 v Sawyer [2013] NZLCDT 47. 9 National Standards Committee v Shi [2018] NZLCDT In Parshotam, the practitioner was suspended for nine months in circumstances where he fa......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Parshotam
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 1 June 2016
    ...13 14 Above n 1. Auck land Standards Committee No. 2 v Sharma [2015] NZLCDT 12. Wellington Standards Committees No. 1 & No. 2 v Sawyer [2013] NZLCDT 47. Wellington Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Societ y v Lester [2015] NZLCDT conduct charges. Although a more serious charge wa......
  • Legal Complaints Review Officer v Morrison
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 27 November 2018
    ...NZLCDT 60. 7 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Parshotam [2016] NZLCDT 15. 8 Wellington Standards Committees No. 1 and No. 2 v Sawyer [2013] NZLCDT 47. 9 National Standards Committee v Shi [2018] NZLCDT In Parshotam, the practitioner was suspended for nine months in circumstances where he fa......