Wilson v R
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judgment Date | 2015 |
| Neutral Citation | [2015] NZSC 189 |
| Date | 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Ortmann and Others v United States of America and Another
...the 1994 Act has many similarities with the definition of “document” in s 217 of the Crimes Act 1961 discussed by the Supreme Court in Dixon v R. 229 There the Supreme Court held that digital CCTV footage extracted from an employer's computer by a security guard was both a “document” for th......
-
Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 13)
...Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19; R v Looseley [2001] 1 WLR 2060. 259 R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court; Ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42; Wilson v The Queen [2015] NZSC 189. 260 Moti v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 456. 261 R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court; Ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42; M......
-
Smith v R
...he could be arrested. In our judgement, the process of this court was not subverted. 52 Finally in this survey of the case law, we refer to Wilson v R. 42 Wilson is not a disguised extradition case, but rather concerned police misconduct in producing a false search warrant, targeted at an u......
-
Hager v Attorney-General
...justice” and that a warrant should not be granted or executed in a manner which impairs public dissemination of the news. 51 Wilson v R [2015] NZSC 189 at [32]–[33], [35]. A similar view on the importance of judges in issuing warrants was also reflected in the Crown Law advice to the Attor......
Request a trial to view additional results