Your World of Legal Intelligence
 New Zealand | 1-800-335-6202

Yates v Yates

Cited in 2 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionNew Zealand
Year1913
Date1913
CourtUnspecified Court (New Zealand)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Debenhams Retail Plc v Sun Alliance & London Assurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 July 2005
    ...The Judge was right to say not much assistance is gained from it (para.72). Actually none is. Nor is any assistance to be gained from Yates v Yates [1913] 33 NZLR 281 a case holding that the expression "gross income" in a will did not mean "gross receipts". The context was wildly different......
  • Debenhams Retail Plc v Sun Alliance & London Assurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 9 November 2004
    ...of the agreement between the parties. 68 In this respect, an analogy could be made with the expression "gross income". In Yates v Yates [1913] 33 NZLR 281, for example, Cooper J, in the Supreme Court of Auckland, considered a testamentary gift to the trustees of a testatrix of a commission ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT