AC Hatrick (NZ) v Nelson Carlton Construction Company ((in Liquidation))

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1964
Year1964
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Collins (Contractors) Ltd v Baltic Quay Management (1994) Ltd 2004
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 March 2005
    ...[1947] AC 428 and from Richmond J's first instance decision in the New Zealand Supreme Court in Hatrick v Nelson Carlton Construction [1964] NZLR 72. 40 Mr Akenhead had found the approach of Richmond J in Hatrick informative and compelling. He quoted lengthy passages from the judgment at pa......
  • Collins (Contractors) Ltd v Baltic Quay Management (1994) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 11 October 2004
    ...428. The second was Richmond J's decision in the New Zealand Supreme Court in AC Hatrick (NZ) Ltd v Nelson Carlton Construction Co. Ltd [1964] NZLR 72. 9487. The latter case had in fact gone to the New Zealand Court of Appeal and had been reported at [1965] NZLR 144. This reference is not p......
  • Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 6 July 2000
    ...depends on the terms of the contract. 132. In A.C. Hatrick (N.Z.) Ltd v Nelson Carlton Construction Co. Ltd. (in liquidation) and others (1964) NZLR 72, the role of an engineer/certifier was in issue. Richmond J cited (at p.78) the following passage from Devlin J’s judgment in Minster Trust......
3 books & journal articles
  • Contract administration
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...being held liable to the owner for breach of contract or negligence. 228 221 AC Hatrick (NZ) Ltd v Nelson Carlton Construction Co Ltd [1964] NZLr 72, [1965] NZLr 144; Canterbury Pipe Lines Ltd v he Christchurch Drainage Board (1979) 16 BLr 76 at 97–98, per Cooke J [NZCa]. See also Amec Civi......
  • EMPLOYERS’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR ARCHITECTS’ CERTIFICATIONS: THE IMPLIED TERM THAT NEVER WAS HONG HUAT AND BEYOND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Jackson v Barry Railway Co(1893) 1 Ch 238 at 247; AC Hatrick (N.Z.) Ltd v Nelson Carlton Construction Co Ltd (In Liquidation) and Others[1964] NZLR 72. The bipartisan reliance was previously recognised by the House of Lords in Sutcliffe v Thackrah[1974] AC 727 at 737D, 740H. 11 It is submit......
  • Building and Construction Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...1 Ch 238 at p.247 which was cited with approval by the Court of Appeal in [AC Hatrick (NZ) Ltd v Nelson Carlton Construction Co Ltd(1964) NZLR 72] at p.150 and 153. The architect must also know that if he is negligent in issuing certificates he might cause loss to one of these parties.” Liq......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT