Auckland Standards Committee v Sorensen
| Court | Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] NZLCDT 23 |
| Citation | [2012] NZLCDT 23 |
| Year | 2012 |
| Date | 24 August 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Tennet v Wellington Standards Committee 2
...not consider O’Boyle to be a helpful comparator to the present case, as I consider that 42 43 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Sorensen [2012] NZLCDT 23 at See O’Boyle, above n 26, at [15]–[16]. although the practitioner’s misconduct was dishonest and intentional, it was mitigated by the fa......
-
Sorensen v New Zealand Law Society (auckland Standards Committee Number 2)
...Society (Auckland Standards Committee Number 2) HC Auckland CIV-2011404-3044, 1 June 2012. 3 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Sorensen [2012] NZLCDT 23 at Ibid, at [40] – [43]. 2 (c) to reimburse the New Zealand Law Society (“Society”) the sum of $17,200, being the sum the Society was requi......