Auckland Standards Committee v Holmes

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2011] NZLCDT 31
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Bogiatto
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 6 Octubre 2017
    ...Otago Standards Committee of the New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZHC 1971 [17 August 2017]. 4 Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. 5 Zhao at paragraph d. That the respondent on his own admission was essentially carrying on his practice in the same manner as previousl......
  • Zhao v Otago Standards Committee of New Zealand Law Society
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 17 Agosto 2017
    ...11 12 13 Auckland Standards Committee No 4 v Appleby [2014] NZLCDT 34. At [16] – [19]. Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. [51] The way the Tribunal viewed the misconduct in Holmes illustrates the that answers Mr Zhang’s submission: decisions in these cases turn on ......
  • Otago Standards Committee v Zhao
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 23 Noviembre 2016
    ...Wellington Standards Committee v Manktelow [2012] NZLCDT 30. 14 Auckland Standards Committee 5 of the New Zealand Law Society v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. 15 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Salter [2015] NZLCDT whose liquidations had been completed. There were comparatively small amounts of ......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Kang
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 19 Marzo 2018
    ...that the respondent accepted from the outset that his conduct was unsatisfactory. He 3 4 Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. Otago Standards Committee 1 v Stewart [2016] NZLCDT submitted that therefore the Committee’s prosecution of the respondent was unnecessary and t......