Auckland Standards Committee v Holmes

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2011] NZLCDT 31
Citation[2011] NZLCDT 31
Year2011
Date16 November 2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • LCRO 83/2020 BA v SC
    • New Zealand
    • Legal Complaints Review Officer
    • 18 December 2020
    ...paid that money from his trust account. 27 Rule 4.1. 28 Rule 4.2.1(a). 29 Rules 7 and 7.1. 30 Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31 at [24]; Johnson v Westland Standards Committee 3 [2019] NZHC 619 at [85], cited in Paul Collins “Professional Responsibility in New Zealand......
  • Zhao v Otago Standards Committee of New Zealand Law Society
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 17 August 2017
    ...11 12 13 Auckland Standards Committee No 4 v Appleby [2014] NZLCDT 34. At [16] – [19]. Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. [51] The way the Tribunal viewed the misconduct in Holmes illustrates the that answers Mr Zhang’s submission: decisions in these cases turn on ......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Bogiatto
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 6 October 2017
    ...Otago Standards Committee of the New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZHC 1971 [17 August 2017]. 4 Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. 5 Zhao at paragraph d. That the respondent on his own admission was essentially carrying on his practice in the same manner as previousl......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Bogiatto
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 6 October 2017
    ...Otago Standards Committee of the New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZHC 1971 [17 August 2017]. 4 Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Holmes [2011] NZLCDT 31. 5 Zhao at paragraph d. That the respondent on his own admission was essentially carrying on his practice in the same manner as previousl......
  • Get Started for Free