Bank of New Zealand v Greenwood
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
- Muhamad Saleh bin Hashim (mendakwa di dalam keupayaan sebagai wakil untuk semua orang yang disenaraikan di perenggan 1.1 Penyataan Tuntutan) v Percon Corporation Sdn Bhd
-
Hunter v London Docklands Development Corporation
...14Mr Brennan also relied upon the decision of Hardie Boys J in the High Court of New Zealand in Bank of New Zealand v Greenwood [1984] 1 NZLR 525. By reason of the design of a building, the rays of the sun on it threw off a dazzling glare to the windows of another building and the glare was......
-
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
...neighbouring premises were held to fall into that category. Such cases must however be relatively rare. In one New Zealand case, Bank of New Zealand v. Greenwood [1984] 1 N.Z.L.R. 525, the glass roof of a verandah which deflected the sun's rays so that a dazzling glare was thrown on to neig......
-
Fearn and Others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery
...to a public sewer ( Barratt Homes Ltd v Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig (No 2) [2013] 1 WLR 3486). 14 In the New Zealand case of Bank of New Zealand v Greenwood [1984] 1 NZLR 525, the interference consisted in a dazzling glare caused by the deflection of the sun's rays off the glass roof of the defe......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Nuisance — the Environmental Tort? Hunter v Canary Wharf in the House of Lords
...1 WLR 335, wherethe sight of prostitutes and clients entering and leaving premises was actionable, and Bank of NewZealand vGreenwood [1984] 1 NZLR 525, where a dazzling glare was reflected from the defendant’sverandah into the plaintiff’s buildings.November 1998] Hunter vCanary WharfThe Mod......