Benton v Miller & Poulgrain (A Firm)
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Year | 2005 |
| Date | 2005 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
Wagner v Gill
...166 (HL); 4 Eng Ltd v Harper [2008] EWHC 915 (Ch); Takaro Properties Ltd v Rowling [1986] 1 NZLR 22 (CA); Benton v Miller & Poulgrain [2005] 1 NZLR 66 (CA); and Firth v Sutton [2010] NSWCA ...
-
Body Corporate 366611 v Wu Coa
...below. 76 See [100]–[103] below. 77 For a discussion of relevant loss of chance principles see Benton v Miller and Poulgrain (A Firm) [2005] 1 NZLR 66 (CA) at [44]–[53] (Glazebrook and William Young JJ) and 78 Above n 27. 79 Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655 (CA). 80 At 666. 81 At 675......
-
Sherwin Chan & Walshe Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Sir Robert Jones and Yorgen Holdings Ltd
...and [201]. 53 Lai v Chamberlains [2006] NZSC 70, [2007] 2 NZLR 7 at [77]–[78]. 54 At [207]. 55 Benton v Miller & Poulgrain (a firm) [2005] 1 NZLR 66 (CA) at 56 J L Powell and R Stewart (eds) Jackson & Powell on Professional Liability (7th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2012) at [17–082]. 57 ......
-
Parkhurst v Bisht
...repaid was around $70,000. Mr Madhan Bisht thought it was less, $45,000 or $50,000. 10 At [51]. 11 Benton v Miller & Poulgrain (a firm) [2005] 1 NZLR 66 (CA); and Ingram v Patcroft Properties Ltd (2009) 10 NZCPR 426 12 District Court decision, above n 2, at [86]. 13 At [88]. 14 This include......
Request a trial to view additional results