Body Corporate 329331 v Escrow Holdings FORTY-ONE Limited

Judgment Date20 April 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] NZHC 754
CourtHigh Court
Date20 April 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Moeke v South Waikato District Council
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 12 September 2019
    ...at 660. Land Transfer Act 2017, s 138(1)(b). Sims v Lowe, above n 1, at 659–660. Body Corporate 329331 v Escrow Holdings Forty-One Ltd [2017] NZHC 754, (2017) 18 NZCPR 466 at At [8]–[9]. To establish a reasonably arguable case there must be evidence tending to prove the facts relied on. Ass......
  • Syed Family Limited v Malik
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2017
    ...NZCA 342 at [28]. Philpott v NZI Bank Ltd (1989) 1 NZ ConvC 190,246 (CA); and Body Corporate 329331 v Escrow Holdings Forty-One Ltd [2017] NZHC 754 at [8]. At [8]-[9]. Pacific Homes Ltd (in rec) v Consolidated Joineries Ltd [1996] 2 NZLR 652 (CA) at 656; Stewart v Kaipara Consultants Ltd [2......
  • Taylor v Naera
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 2 August 2019
    ...v Rose and rearticulated more recently in Wakenshaw v Wakenshaw.10 6 7 8 9 10 Body Corporate 329331 v Escrow Holdings Forty-One Ltd [2017] NZHC 754 at At [8]–[9]. See Botany Land Development, above n 2, at [24]. See for example Marshall v Bournville [2013] NZCA 271, [2013] 3 NZLR 766. Lanko......
  • Steele v Dallas
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 28 August 2018
    ...656 at 660 Land Transfer Act 1952, s 137(1). Sims v Lowe, above n 3, at 659-660. Body Corporate 329331 v Escrow Holdings Forty-One Ltd [2017] NZHC 754 at undisputed contemporary documents or other statements made by the same deponent or inherently improbable it may be. … To establish a reas......