Burgess v Tait and ORS
Judgment Date | 02 October 2014 |
Neutral Citation | [2014] NZHC 2408 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 02 October 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Burgess v Tait and Ors
...District Court, Christchurch Third Defendant and Legal Complaints Review Officer Fourth Defendant and New Zealand Law Society Intervenor [2014] NZHC 2408 CIV-2013-409-001385 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY Application for judicial review of two decisions of the Legal ......
-
LCRO 197/2017 SM v HW
...and Kerry Cook Ethics, Professional Responsibility and the Lawyer (3rd ed, LexisNexis, Wellington, 2016) at [9.2]. 49 Burgess v Tait [2014] NZHC 2408 at That position was affirmed in Chapman v The Legal Complaints Review Officer where the Court noted that:50 … it appears to me that the LCRO......
-
C v Legal Complaints Review Officer
...of the Act, likewise quash the LCRO’s findings of unsatisfactory conduct and set aside all orders made by the LCRO. 17 Burgess v Tait [2014] NZHC 2408 at C and the firm preferred that I did not remit the matter back to the LCRO, principally because of the lengthy delay experienced in having......
-
LCRO 024/2018 NN v AE
...exercise a discretion to take no action, or no further action on the complaint.28 25 That discretion may be exercised in Burgess v Tait [2014] NZHC 2408 at Chapman v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2015] NZHC 1500 at [47]. 27 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, s 211(1)(b). 28 Section 138. ......
Request a trial to view additional results