Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Taffs

Neutral Citation[2013] NZLCDT 13
Year2013
Date24 April 2013
Citation[2013] NZLCDT 13
CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • New Zealand Law Society v John Llewellyn Stanley
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 August 2020
    ...to admission. Hawke’s Bay Lawyers Standards Committee v Beacham [2012] NZLCDT 29; Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee v Taffs [2013] NZLCDT 13; Waikato/BOP Lawyers’ Standards Committee No 1 v Pou [2014] NZLCDT 86; Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Rohde [2016] NZLCDT 9; and Auckland S......
  • New Zealand Law Society v John Llewellyn Stanley
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 August 2020
    ...to admission. Hawke’s Bay Lawyers Standards Committee v Beacham [2012] NZLCDT 29; Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee v Taffs [2013] NZLCDT 13; Waikato/BOP Lawyers’ Standards Committee No 1 v Pou [2014] NZLCDT 86; Auckland Standards Committee No 5 v Rohde [2016] NZLCDT 9; and Auckland S......
  • Auckland Standards Committee v Thomson
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 11 July 2014
    ...[2011] NZLCDT 11, Hawke’s Bay Lawyers Standards Committee v Beecham [2012] NZLCDT 29, Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee v Taffs [2013] NZLCDT 13, National Standards Committee v Sarah [2014] NZLCDT 26, National Standards Committee v Toner [2013] NZLCDT [2013] NZLCDT 43. 4 6 [18] Having......
  • EV v IG LCRO 111/2013
    • New Zealand
    • Legal Complaints Review Officer
    • 8 September 2015
    ...as a whole had been brought into disrepute. 29 LCRO 33/2013 at [47]-[48]. See e.g. Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee v Taffs [2013] NZLCDT 13, Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Ravelich [2011] NZLCDT 11, Waikato Bay of Plenty District Law Society v Baledrokadroka [2002] NZAR WDLS v Lei......
  • Get Started for Free