Craddock's Transport Ltd v Stuart

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1970
Year1970
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Wall v Radford
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 Enero 1991
  • Jaidin bin Jaiman v Loganathan a/l Karpaya
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 1 Octubre 2012
    ...differ from the issues of fact in DC Suit 3018/2010: at [8]. Bell v Holmes [1956] 1 WLR 1359 (refd) Craddock's Transport Ltd v Stuart [1970] NZLR 499 (refd) Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck [2007] 1 SLR (R) 453; [2007] 1 SLR 453 (folld) Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v MCST Plan No 301 [2005] 3 SLR ......
  • Jaidin bin Jaiman v Loganathan a/l Karpaya and another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 1 Octubre 2012
    ...and his insurer who is acting with subrogation rights (see eg, Wall v Radford [1992] R.T.R. 109, 117; Craddock’s Transport Ltd v Stuart [1970] NZLR 499 CA, 524). As pointed out by the authors of Res Judicata: There will be many fewer successful pleas of issue estoppel in road accident cases......
  • VICTORlA STREET APARMENTS Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and ANOR v SHARMA and ORS HC AK
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 14 Octubre 2011
    ...be the subject of issue estoppel to have been “distinctly put in issue” in the previous litigation. In Craddockk Dunsport Ltd v Stuart [1970] NZLR 499 at 504, North P said that before an issue estoppel could arise, the issue in the second cause of action needed to be “identical” to the issu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT