D (CA95/2014) v R CA95/2014
| Judgment Date | 15 May 2015 |
| Neutral Citation | [2015] NZCA 171 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 15 May 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Chetty v R
...this Court explained in M (CA68/2015) v R,15 the courts take that approach because an understanding of 11 12 13 14 15 D (CA95/2014) v R [2015] NZCA 171 at [22]; and Zhang v R [2013] NZCA 87 at See Bain v R [2007] UKPC 33, (2007) 23 CRNZ 71 at [103]. R A v R [2010] NZCA 57, (2010) 25 CRNZ 13......
-
Smith v R
...contact and friendship after the charge period. Mr Smith’s version of events, including 5 6 7 At [50]. See for example D (CA95/2014) v R [2015] NZCA 171 at [47]–[48]; Oquist v R [2015] NZCA 310 at [59]; and O’Reilly v R [2015] NZCA 604 at [51]. CT v R, above n 4, at [49]. Ms Grau identified......
-
B v R
...R [2013] UKPC 28, [2014] 2 NZLR 273 at [120]. 6 There was evidence of illicit drug use but only by one complainant. 7 D (CA95/2014) v R [2015] NZCA 171 at [28]; and M (CA68/2015) v R [2017] NZCA 333 at 8 See for example Leef v R [2011] NZCA 567 at [16]; and Bruce v R [2015] NZCA 332, (2015......
-
N (CA200/2016) v R
...was for two reasons. First, when 6 7 R v AM (CA27/2009) [2010] NZCA 114, [2010] 2 NZLR 750. R v P [2015] NZHC 1686; D (CA95/2014) v R [2015] NZCA 171. regard was had to the examples given of cases falling within band 4, the was more serious than the present case. Second, the case did not in......
Request a trial to view additional results