Farrimond v Caffe Coffee (nz) Limited

Judgment Date27 February 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] NZCA 34
Date27 February 2017
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Zhao v He
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 19 May 2020
    ...with the general principles set out at r 14.2. 3 4 Which is the subject of item 13 of sch 3. Water Guard NZ Ltd v Midgen Enterprises Ltd [2017] NZCA 34 at [13], affirmed Enterprises Ltd v UV Water Systems Ltd [2017] NZSC 68. I note though that Midgen was a case about who should receive cost......
  • Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • 20 February 2020
    ...in fact occurred. I found that if 8 9 10 11 12 Elmsly, above n 4. At [39]. At [45]. At [48]. See also Farrimond v Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd [2017] NZCA 34, [2017] ERNZ 77 at this issue had been raised for investigation, it would not have resulted in anything other than a warning in the particul......
  • Lancom Technology Ltd v Forman and ors
    • New Zealand
    • 1 January 2018
    ...costs under the circumstances described within the rule, 16 17 Moore v McNabb (2005) 18 PRNZ 127 (CA). Farrimond v Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd [2017] NZCA 34. that presumption does not translate into an entitlement and it is still to the overriding discretion of the Court recorded in r 14.11(1). ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT