Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v M

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2013] NZLCDT 1
Citation[2013] NZLCDT 1
Year2013
Date24 January 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Orlov v The National Standards Committee 1 and The Auckland Standards Commitee 1
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 6 August 2013
    ...NZHC 798. At [14]. Malfanti v The Legal Professional Disciplinary Tribunal (1993) 4 LPDR 17 (NSWCA). Hawke’s Bay Standards Committee v M [2013] NZLCDT 1 Hawke’s Bay Standards Committee that it had no power to strike out or dismiss charges at a pre-hearing stage. The Tribunal rejected this a......
  • M v Hawke's Bay Standards Committee
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 29 November 2013
    ...decline leave, for the reasons given below. 1 M v Hawke's Bay Standards Committee [2013] NZHC 2219. Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v M [2013] NZLCDT 1. 3 Submissions on [Applicant’s] Application for Leave to Appeal on Certain Questions of Law to the Court of Appeal dated 30 October 2013; an......
  • M v Hawke's Bay Standards Committee
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 30 August 2013
    ...That would mean the Appellant could succeed only if he were able to establish that the Tribunal 1 Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v M [2013] NZLCDT 1. Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, s May v May (1982) 1 NZFLR 165 (CA). 2 made an error of law, took into account irrelevant considerations, ......