Hayes v Hayes
Judgment Date | 19 March 2020 |
Neutral Citation | [2020] NZHC 569 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Collins v Collins
...as a trustee. I am satisfied that service would serve no purpose. 1 2 3 High Court Rules 2016, r 19.5(1). Rule 19.5(2). Hayes v Hayes [2020] NZHC 569 and Polson McMillan Trustee Company No. 1 Ltd v Lumsden [2020] NZHC For completeness, I am also satisfied that the orders sought do not chang......
-
Polson Mcmillan Trustee Company No. 1 Ltd As Trustee of The Leslie Lumsden Family Trust v Lumsden
...leave to bring this proceeding by way of originating application and I so order.2 1 2 High Court Rules 2016, r 19.5(2). Hayes v Hayes [2020] NZHC 569. Litigation guardian and service I am satisfied that Leslie is an incapacitated person for the purposes of r 4.29 High Court Rules 2016. Give......
-
2922
...both relieves him of a burden he is now unable to discharge and promotes the efficient administration of the Trust.2 1 2 Hayes v Hayes [2020] NZHC 569. I note there is no application to remove him as ‘appointer’. In view of his deterioration presumably, limited life expectancy, I anticipate......