Hofman v Hofman
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1965 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Pettitt v Pettitt
...Property Act, 1952, to "make such order with respect to the property in dispute … as it thinks fit". In his interesting judgment in Hofman v. Hofman [1965] N.Z.L.R. 795 (affirmed on appeal [1967] N.Z.L.R. 9) Woodhouse J. said: "There is a consistent line of authority to the effect that the......
-
Bhura v Bhura
...principal problem with it is that that it allows the "solid tug of money" (as Woodhouse J evocatively put it (echoing George Eliot) in Hofman v Hofman [1965] NZLR 795 at 800) "to submerge any faint suggestion that other [non-financial] contributions play a valuable part in the acquisition o......
-
劉 對 徐
...with it is that that it allows the “solid tug of money” (as Woodhouse J evocatively put it (echoing George Eliot) in Hofman v Hofman [1965] NZLR 795 at 800) “to submerge any faint suggestion that other [non-financial] contributions play a valuable part in the acquisition of family v) A furt......
-
陳 對 葉及另二人
...with it is that that is allows the “solid tug of money” (as Woodhouse J evocatively put it(echoing George Eliot) in Hofman v Hofman [1965] NZLR 795 at 800) “to submerge any faint suggestion that other [non-financial] contributions play a valuable part in the acquisition of family v) A furth......
Request a trial to view additional results