Irina Zharkikh, The (Ksenia Zharkikh)
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd v the Ship Comandate
-
Handytankers Ks v The Owners And/or Demise Charterers Of The Ship Or Vessel M/v “Alas”, Subsequently Renamed As “Kombos” And Those Other Vessels Named In Schedule “A” Annexed Hereto
...K and The Tuyuti was “obviously correct”. 16. The Rena K has also been followed in New Zealand and Australia: The Irina Zharkikh [2001] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 319 at 17. Mr Alder submitted that The Rena K had been “irretrievably undermined” by The Indian Grace No. 2 [1998] AC 878. I do not agree. 18......
-
Handytankers Ks v The Owners And/or Demise Charterers Of The Ship Or Vessel M/v “Alas” Subsequently Renamed As “Kombos” And Those Other Vessels Named In Schedule “A” Annexed Hereto
...[1993] QB 673. It has also been followed in Hong Kong in The Brittania [1998] 1 HKC 221, and in New Zealand in The Irina Zharkikh [2001] 2 Lloyds Rep 319. It has also been accepted as good law in England after The Indian Grace (No. 2), in The Bumbesti [2000] QB 559 (although it does not see......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Right To Arrest Vessels Post-judgment/award ' What Is The Tide?
...section 34 of the CJJA only, which is not applicable in Australia. New Zealand The New Zealand High Court in The Irina Zharkikh [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 319 rejected defendant shipowners' argument that if an arbitral award was made, it would result in the underlying cause of action merging in t......