Jeffrey Robert Bunting v R
| Judgment Date | 09 September 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] NZSC 95 |
| Date | 09 September 2019 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Cecilia Victoria Uhrle v R
...matter is properly pursued through the prerogative of mercy under s 406 of the Crimes Act. 22 23 24 25 See, for example, Bunting v R [2019] NZSC 95 at [10]–[11]; and Milner v R [2015] NZSC (2015) 27 CRNZ 412 at [15]. See also Rangitira Developments Ltd v Royal Forest and Bird Protection Soc......
-
Cecilia Victoria Uhrle v R
...matter is properly pursued through the prerogative of mercy under s 406 of the Crimes Act. 22 23 24 25 See, for example, Bunting v R [2019] NZSC 95 at [10]–[11]; and Milner v R [2015] NZSC (2015) 27 CRNZ 412 at [15]. See also Rangitira Developments Ltd v Royal Forest and Bird Protection Soc......
-
Milner v R
...[2008] NZSC 94, (2008) 19 PRNZ 132 at [1]; and Suckling v R [2016] NZSC 133, (2016) 27 NZTC 22-071 at [6]. See, for example, Bunting v R [2019] NZSC 95 at applications for exercise of the prerogative fail, and many are brought by persons rightly convicted, a number brought by the wrongly co......
-
Bunting v R
...602 [Court of Appeal judgment]. At [25]–[26]. At [29]–[39]. Otago Standards Committee v Claver [2019] NZLCDT 8 at [1]. At 11. Bunting v R [2019] NZSC 95 at At [8]–[10]. [5] Mr Bunting now applies for recall of this Court’s judgment in light of the new evidence. Submissions [6] For Mr Buntin......
Request a trial to view additional results