Kerr v R
| Judgment Date | 02 November 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] NZCA 498 |
| Date | 02 November 2017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Waugh v R
...R v Nathan [2017] NZHC 806; R v Williams CA 392/97, 31 March 1998; Bullen v R [2017] NZCA 615. Hemopo v R [2016] NZCA 242; Kerr v R [2017] NZCA 498. [12] He then considered aggravating and mitigating personal factors. He there were no aggravating factors. Mr Waugh was a first-time offender ......
-
Houkamau v New Zealand Police
...clearly valued by his community and who contributes significantly to it. 14 See, for instance, Mallett v R [2014] NZCA 39; and Kerr v R [2017] NZCA 498. [41] The result is that there were additional discounts in the region of four that were available to Mr Houkamau but which were not taken ......
-
Waho v New Zealand Police
...previous good character. 13 14 He submitted that the present Tutakangahau v R [2014] NZCA 279, [2014] 3 NZLR 482 at [35]. Kerr v R [2017] NZCA 498. offending is a fall from grace for Mr Waho as he has no previous violence and only one previous conviction for drug offending. Mr Terekia refer......
-
Wayne Jones v R
...hearsay statement is one that “was made by a person other than a witness”: see s 4 of the Evidence Act 2006. Evidence Act, s 4. Kerr v R [2017] NZCA 498 (French, Williams and Woolford JJ) [CA Morgan v R [2010] NZSC 23, [2010] 2 NZLR 508 at [11] per Elias CJ dissenting. CA judgment, above n ......
Request a trial to view additional results