A Labour Inspector (ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) v Gill Pizza Limited

Judgment Date17 May 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] NZCA 192
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Gill Pizza Limited v A Labour Inspector (ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment)
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • December 21, 2021
    ...the Employment Relations Authority 5 6 7 Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) v Gill Pizza Ltd [2021] NZCA 192, (2021) 11 NZELC ¶79-134 (Cooper, Clifford and Courtney JJ) [CA Gill Pizza Ltd v A Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) ......
  • Tam Dental Group Limited v Chang
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • November 3, 2022
    ...Inspector v Gill Pizza.3 2 3 FMV v TZB, above n 1. Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) v Gill Pizza Ltd [2021] NZCA 192, [2021] ERNZ If the Employment Court determines that Ms Chang was not an employee, then and only then can TDG assert its rights in this Cour......
  • Gill Pizza Limited v a Labour Inspector (ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment)
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • August 12, 2021
    ...OF THE COURT A Leave to appeal is granted (A Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) v Gill Pizza Ltd [2021] NZCA 192). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that the Employment Court erred in finding that, if a defendant a......
  • Gill Pizza Limited v A Labour Inspector (ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment)
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • August 12, 2021
    ...OF THE COURT A Leave to appeal is granted (A Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) v Gill Pizza Ltd [2021] NZCA 192). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that the Employment Court erred in finding that, if a defendant a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT