Lai v Chamberlains

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Judgment Date2006
Neutral Citation[2006] NZSC 70
Year2006
Date2006
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
112 cases
  • Siemer v The Solicitor-General
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 2013
    ...of a court in cases of abuse of process are discussed in Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 (HL); and Lai v Chamberlains [2006] NZSC 70, [2007] 2 NZLR 18 Although avoiding the terms “jurisdictional” and “non-jurisdictional”, the distinction drawn by the maj......
  • Kai Yip Cheung v R
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 11 Mayo 2021
    ...what was always there to be found. 24 It is now uncontroversial that judges do make law, or, at the very least, as Tipping J put it in Lai v Chamberlains, they decide what the law was when the facts giving rise to the litigation took place. 23 In Lai, the Supreme Court recognised that there......
  • Attorney-General v Chapman Sc
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 Septiembre 2011
    ...the direct liability recognised in Baigent is available in respect of judicial conduct was assumed by three judges of this Court in Lai v Chamberlains 87 and by a unanimous Court in R v Williams (where, again, trial delay was in issue in circumstances where some shared responsibility betwee......
  • Jones v Kaney
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 Marzo 2011
    ...of Australia in D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12, (2005) 223 CLR 1, para 39; by the Supreme Court of New Zealand in Lai v Chamberlains [2007] 2 NZLR 7; and by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Reynolds v Kingston (Police Services Board) [2007] ONCA 166. The immunity has been......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Not Yet Dead: Wright v Paton Farrell and Advocates' Immunity in Scotland
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 70-3, May 2007
    • 1 Mayo 2007
    ...accepted the immunity: Demarco vUngaro(1979) 95 DLR (3d) 385.New Zealand formerly recognised it,b ut abolished it in Chamberlain vLai[2006] NZSC 70.The immunity continues to be recognised in Australia: D’Orta-Ekenaike.57 It is anomalous to treat di¡erentlypeople in like positions (ie advoca......
  • Some Results So Far
    • United Kingdom
    • Bringing Justice Home. The Road to Final Appellate and Regional Court Establishment
    • 28 Octubre 2008
    ...against whom a writ of habeas corpus has been issued requiring delivery to the court of an abducted child. Torts Chamberlains v Lai [2006] NZSC 70 - A consideration of whether barristers have immunity from suit for negligence in connection with work undertaken in court. This case presented ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT