Laipato v R
| Judgment Date | 26 October 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] NZCA 562 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Karl Greening v R
...held that s 27 reports should not be produced for the first time on appeal: Carroll v R [2019] NZCA 172 at [8]. See Laipato v R [2021] NZCA 562 for an example of a case where leave to adduce a s 27 report on appeal was Berkland, above n 10. At [172]. as if it were fresh evidence.14 The Cour......
-
Walker v NZ Police
...Ahumai Tawa [2021] NZHC 2091; Bowring v New Zealand Police [2020] NZHC 3252; and Doidge v Police [2021] NZHC 2256. Laipato v R [2021] NZCA 562. Samuels v R [2022] NZHC The report, in my view, makes sobering reading. It is usefully corroborated, to an extent, by accounts from Mr Walker’s sis......
-
Holtz v R
...and a different sentence should be imposed. In Tutakangahau v R,14 the Court of Appeal confirmed that, 12 13 14 At [8]. Laipato v R [2021] NZCA 562. Tutakangahau v R [2014] NZCA 279, [2014] 3 NZLR although not referred to in s 250, the concept of whether a sentence is manifestly excessive: ......