Lake v R
| Judgment Date | 29 July 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] NZCA 352 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
R v Stevens
...required to be met before an ESO is imposed, recently discussed in Hofmann v Department of Corrections [2021] NZCA 256. Lake v R [2021] NZCA 352 at At [26]. At [26]; Corrections Act 2004, s 5(1)(c). [33] In the end, this Court cannot know whether you will be offered the right rehabilitation......
-
Morris v R
...There is a short Provision of Advice 30 31 32 33 34 35 Citing R v Mist [2005] 2 NZLR 791 (CA) and Grant v R [2017] NZCA 614. Lake v R [2021] NZCA 352, at R v Phipps, above n 1, at 7. Wilson v R [2019] NZCA 584. Kumar v R [2015] NZCA 460, at [81]–[83]. At [81], citing Tutakangahau v R [2014]......
-
Stevens v R
...which might require the Department of Corrections to provide the necessary rehabilitation. Because there is no surety the 17 Lake v R [2021] NZCA 352. necessary treatment will be offered, the indefinite sentence is said to be disproportionately … The obligations on the Department of Correct......