Mcmahon v Ah Sam and Vlasic
Judgment Date | 26 March 2014 |
Neutral Citation | [2014] NZHC 659 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 26 March 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Wellington City Council v Registrar of Companies
... [2013] NZCA 659, [2014] 2 NZLR 623. 71 Companies Act, s 284(2). 72 Companies Act, s 286(4). 73 Section 286(1)(d). 74 McMahon v Ah Sam [2014] NZHC 659 at 75 Some of the grounds for disqualification need not be in place at the start of liquidation, but may arise later. See for example s 280(......
-
Wellington City Council v Registrar of Companies
...5(1)(b) and (2). The Companies Office 71 72 73 74 Companies Act, s 284(2). Companies Act, s 286(4). Section 286(1)(d). McMahon v Ah Sam [2014] NZHC 659 at records for Tullow show that Mr Sheppard holds 1,500,000 shares jointly with Mr Dromgool and a further 1,500,000 shares jointly with Mr ......
-
NG and GO v Harkness Law Ltd
...23 Hayim v Citibank [1987] AC 730 (PC) at 748. 24 Roberts v Gill & Co [2010] UKSC 22, [2011] 1 AC 240 at [46]. 25 See McMahon v Ah Sam [2014] NZHC 659. 26 Ng v Harkness Law Ltd [2014] NZHC 850 at 27 Above n 5, at [27]. 28 Above n 4. ...
-
Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Livingspace Properties Limited (in Rec and in Liq)
...n 74, at [47]–[51]. I nevertheless recognise that a contrary conclusion has been reached by Associate Judge Bell in McMahon v Ah Sam [2014] NZHC 659 and in subsequent unnecessarily fall within the regime of the statutory procedure.101 Those types of situation explain why the broader provisi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Is There a Need for Greater Regulation of Insolvency Practitioners in New Zealand? Exploring the Options for Reform
...Limited, Brent Clode, initially appointed his brother-in-law, Michael Cooper 80 Companies Act 1955, s237(1). 81 McMahon v Ah Sam [2014] NZHC 659 at [13]. 82 At [27]. 83 At [34]. 84 At [34]. 85 This was certainly the approach taken in Chapman, Healy Holmberg Trading Partnership, and Norris. ......