Muir & Anor v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
| Judgment Date | 29 August 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] NZHC 2082 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 29 August 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
O’neill v Bridgman
...NZHC 637 at [12], including to review a Registrar’s decision to accept a document for filing: Muir v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2017] NZHC 2082, 28 NZTC 23-029 at [14], [15]”. Department of Justice (Restructuring) Act 1995, s 5(3). [49] The Complaints involve the Court process as oppos......
-
Muir v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
...been instructed. He also declined a recusal application made on the ground of apprehended bias. 19 Muir v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2017] NZHC 2082, (2017) 28 NZTC 23–029. This judgment also dealt with an amended pleading which another party involved in the Trinity scheme had sought t......
-
Muir v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
...yet to be set down but is currently awaiting an application for fixture (CA16/2018). 19 20 21 22 Muir v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2017] NZHC 2082, (2017) 28 NZTC 23–029. judgment also dealt with an amended pleading which another party involved in the Trinity scheme had sought to file ......
-
O’neill v Bridgman
...Reuters) at [HR 2.11.01], referring sto Re Tupou [2018] NZHC 637, (2018) 24 PRNZ 275 at [12]; and Muir v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2017] NZHC 2082, (2017) 28 NZTC 23-029 availed himself of the opportunity they offer.17 He complains that when he has done so, he has not succeeded. But t......
Request a trial to view additional results