New Zealand Māori Council v Angela June Foulkes

Judgment Date29 July 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] NZHC 1777
CourtHigh Court
Date29 July 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
30 cases
  • Enright v Enright
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 22 May 2019
    ...Zurich New Zealand, above n 102, at [62]. Bulley v Attorney-General [2012] NZHC 615 at [51]–[52]. New Zealand Māori Council v Foulkes [2014] NZHC 1777, [2015] NZAR 1441 at Tony’s Brief, above n 24, at [40]–[41]. primarily on the text of the Deed to discern its meaning and purpose. It is imp......
  • Dunstan v Credit Union South
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 20 May 2020
    ...whether judicial review is necessary in light of the availability of alternative remedies.17 16 17 New Zealand Maori Council v Foulkes [2014] NZHC 1777, [2015] NZAR Reflecting the comments of Fisher J in Peters v Collinge, above n 13, cited in [53] above. [58] Mr Dunstan’s position is that ......
  • Justitiae Trustee Co Ltd v NZF Nominees Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 30 March 2021
    ...Smith-Preston Memorial Rest Homes Trust Board [2018] NZHC 3014, [2019] NZAR 92, at [21] citing New Zealand Māori Council v Foulkes [2014] NZHC 1777. being “liquidated, struck off”. I do not consider the preceding words somehow limit the words “any legal restraint”. Given the intention of th......
  • Nz Maori Council v Foulkes
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 18 November 2015
    ...exist by office or expresses a desire to be released. 4 Clause 7.11. 5 Clause 9. 6 Clause 10. 7 The New Zealand Māori Council v Foulkes [2014] NZHC 1777, [2015] NZAR 8 The New Zealand Māori Council v Federation of Māori Authorities Inc [2015] NZHC 1376 at [8]; The New Zealand Māori Council ......
  • Get Started for Free