North Shore City Council v The Attorney-General as Successor to The Assets and Liabilities of The Building Industry Authority

JurisdictionNew Zealand
JudgeElias CJ
Judgment Date27 June 2012
Neutral Citation[2012] NZSC 49
Docket NumberSC 77/2010
CourtSupreme Court
Date27 June 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
92 cases
  • ATTORNEY-GENERAL v Strathboss Kiwifruit Limited
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 9 April 2020
    ...issued unless an IHS151 issued under s 22 was in 146 147 148 149 150 151 See below at [158]. North Shore City Council v Attorney-General [2012] NZSC 49, [2012] 3 NZLR 341 [The Grange] at [224]. Defined in the Introduction and Quarantine of Plants Regulations 1973, reg 2(1) as meaning “propa......
  • Nram Plc Against Jane Steel And Bell & Scott Llp
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 19 February 2016
    ...Rep 272; [1983] Com LR 209 Nocton v Lord AshburtonELR [1914] AC 932; [1914–15] All ER Rep 45 North Shore City Council v Attorney-General [2012] NZSC 49; [2012] 3 NZLR 341 Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough CouncilELR [2001] 2 AC 619; [2000] 3 WLR 776; [2000] 4 All ER 504; [2000] 3 FCR 102; ......
  • Monticello Holdings Limited v Selwyn District Council
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 17 July 2015
    ...of such a nature that the defendant may be said to be under an obligation 27 28 29 30 North Shore City Council v Attorney-General [2012] NZSC 49, [2012] 3 NZLR 341 at See too Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (HL) at 582. Rolls-Royce New Zealand Ltd v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [2005] 1 NZLR 3......
  • Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 21 October 2021
    ...at 267, endorsed in Couch v Attorney-General [2008] NZSC 45, [2008] 3 NZLR 725 at [33] and North Shore City Council v Attorney-General [2012] NZSC 49, [2012] 3 NZLR 341 at 8 Marshall Futures Ltd v Marshall, above n 6, at 324; and Westpac Banking Corp v M M Kembla New Zealand Ltd [2001] 2 N......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • The BIA and leaky buildings - all care, no responsibility?
    • New Zealand
    • Mondaq New Zealand
    • 21 August 2012
    ...Footnotes 1North Shore City Council v The Attorney-General as Successor to the Assets and Liabilities of the Building Industry Authority [2012] NZSC 49 2Building Industry Commission. Reform of Building Control: Volume 1 – Report To The Minister Of Internal Affairs (Building Industry Commiss......
  • Court of Appeal rules that leaky building claims against James Hardie can proceed
    • New Zealand
    • Mondaq New Zealand
    • 26 December 2018
    ...To impose a novel duty of care, the Court of Appeal followed the Supreme Court's decision in North Shore City Council v Attorney-General [2012] NZSC 49, [2012] 3 NZLR 341, requiring the party alleging the duty of care to the loss was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT