Otago Standards Committee v Davidson

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2012] NZLCDT 39
Citation[2012] NZLCDT 39
Year2012
Date20 December 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Otago Standards Committee v Klinkert
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 26 Septiembre 2014
    ...counsel submitted, was that the practitioner placed the fees on trust intentionally and later was dishonest in her dealings with 8 [2012] NZLCDT 39. 8 WINZ when she successfully portrayed to them that the funds had never been in trust and were taken as fees from the Counsel points to the af......
  • Otago Standards Committee v Claver
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 29 Marzo 2019
    ...purpose of the legislation, as stated above, we are conscious that strike- 9 See above n 4 at [32]. Otago Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 39. 11 Hong v Auckland Standards Committee No. 3 [2014] NZHC 12 Auckland Standards Committee No. 1 v Garrett [2011] NZLCDT 29. 13 Wellington......
  • Wellington Standards Committee v Pine
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 15 Julio 2015
    ...The respondent is suspended from practice as a barrister and solicitor for a period of 4 months from 26 June 2015; 4 5 [2014] NZLCDT 51. [2012] NZLCDT 39. 7 (b) He is to pay the Law Society’s costs of He is to refund to the Law Society the Tribunal’s costs which are certified at $3,458.00. ......
  • Legal Complaints Review Officer v Morrison
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 27 Noviembre 2018
    ...starting point of strike-off. 4 Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horsley [2014] NZLCDT 47. Otago Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 39. 6 Standards Committee of the Otago Branch of the New Zealand Law Society v Klinkert [2014] NZLCDT 7 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Par......
  • Get Started for Free