Otago Standards Committee v Davidson

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2012] NZLCDT 39
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Otago Standards Committee v Claver
    • New Zealand
    • 29 March 2019
    ...purpose of the legislation, as stated above, we are conscious that strike- 9 See above n 4 at [32]. Otago Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 39. 11 Hong v Auckland Standards Committee No. 3 [2014] NZHC 12 Auckland Standards Committee No. 1 v Garrett [2011] NZLCDT 29. 13 Wellington......
  • Sorensen v New Zealand Law Society (auckland Standards Committee Number 2)
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 1 July 2013
    ...In that case, the Court found the 20 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Sorensen, above n 3, at [30]. Otago Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 39. 22 Waikato Bay of Plenty 356 Standards Committee v Fletcher [2013] NZLCDT practitioner liable, confirmed on appeal, of dishonestly assis......
  • Cooper v Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No 2 of The New Zealand Law Society
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 28 September 2015
    ...deliberate attempt to mislead; and finally 4 5 6 7 8 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, s 242(1)(e) Otago Standards Committee v Davidson [2012] NZLCDT 39. Hong v Auckland Standards Committee No 3 [2014] NZHC Auckland Standards Committee No 1 v Garrett [2011] NZLCDT 29. Wellington Standards ......
  • Otago Standards Committee v Klinkert
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 26 September 2014
    ...counsel submitted, was that the practitioner placed the fees on trust intentionally and later was dishonest in her dealings with 8 [2012] NZLCDT 39. 8 WINZ when she successfully portrayed to them that the funds had never been trust and were taken as fees from the outset. [16] Counsel points......
  • Request a trial to view additional results