Parkes v R
| Judgment Date | 02 June 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] NZCA 203 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Stacy Paora v R
...to be part of some sort of organised criminal group. 22 23 24 25 Campbell v R [2020] NZCA 631. Hall v R [2020] NZCA 183; and Parkes v R [2020] NZCA 203. Hall v R, above n 23, at Parkes v R, above n 23, at [51]–[52]. [23] In Mr Mansfield’s submissions, Mr Paora’s offending was comparable to ......
-
R v Smith & ORS
...in terms of your role, as it has been established that you had an important operational position within the enterprise. Parkes v R [2020] NZCA 203: In this case, the Court of Appeal determined that a starting point of 9 years’ imprisonment was appropriate, based on supply charges relating t......
-
Clark v R
...substantial sum of cash on each occasion, and self-reported that he would gamble $1,000 at a time. Hall v R [2020] NZCA 183. Parkes v R [2020] NZCA 203. Mr Watene-Toi was involved in the manufacturing of a little over one kilogram of methamphetamine. He not only assisted in bringing the man......
-
Whale v R
...addiction. No discount was given. 8 9 10 11 12 Roberts v R [2019] NZHC 3319. At [36]. Roulston v R [2020] NZCA 255. At [42]. Parkes v R [2020] NZCA 203 at In Whiteford v R, the quantity of methamphetamine was 53 grams.13 It was accepted that Mr Whiteford was addicted during the period of of......