R v Condon
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] NZSC 62 |
| Date | 2006 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
126 cases
-
Ashley Dwayne Guy v R
...(No 4) 2011. The replacement provision is s 232 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. 55 R v Matenga [2009] NZSC 18, [2009] 3 NZLR 145. 56 R v Condon [2006] NZSC 62, [2007] 1 NZLR 300 at 57 R v Matenga, above n 55, at [31] (original emphasis). 58 Guy v R [2012] NZCA 416 at [34] (Arnold, Wil......
-
Siemer v The Solicitor-General
...v R [2002] UKPC 19, [2002] 1 WLR 2237 at [28]; and R v Horsham Justices ex parte Farquharson [1982] 1 QB 762 (CA). 29 See discussion in Condon v R [2006] NZSC 62, [2007] 1 NZLR 300 at [77]; and in R v Hansen, above n 28, at 30 Article 19(3). 31 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 3(a)......
-
Siemer v The SOLICITOR-GENERAL
...person has the right “to apply, in accordance with law, for judicial review of that determination”. 29 30 31 See discussion in Condon v R [2006] NZSC 62, [2007] 1 NZLR 300 at [77]; and in R v above n 28, at [36]–[38]. Article 19(3). New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 3(a). [22] The huma......
-
Mark Edward Lundy v R
...require that an appeal should be allowed and a retrial ordered whenever there has been a miscarriage at the first trial. 24 The Court cited R v Condon, in which it adopted the passage just cited from Randall when discussing the requirements of a fair trial and held that a “fundamentally fla......
Request a trial to view additional results