R v Ellis

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Neutral Citation[2011] NZCA 90
Date2011
Year2011
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 21 May 2015
    ...v. Berllaque et al., [2003] N.R. Uned. 299; [2004] 1 W.L.R. 201; [2003] UKPC 76, refd to. [para. 303]. R. v. Ellis, [2011] 4 L.R.C. 515; [2011] NZCA 90, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 11(d), sect. 11(f) [para. 47]. Authors and Works No......
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 21 May 2015
    ...v. Berllaque et al., [2003] N.R. Uned. 299; [2004] 1 W.L.R. 201; [2003] UKPC 76, refd to. [para. 303]. R. v. Ellis, [2011] 4 L.R.C. 515; [2011] NZCA 90, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 11(d), sect. 11(f) [para. 47]. Authors and Works No......
  • Carvel Hines v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 29 July 2022
    ...facts contained in those cases demonstrate issues of apparent bias, the same cannot be said of the instant case. He relied on the case of R v Ellis [2011] 4 LRC 515 in contending that the appellant must provide evidence before the court to show the reason the jury list is needed. He submit......
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), [2015] N.R. TBEd. MY.018
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 21 May 2015
    ...is an essential ingredient of a fair trial by jury". This view was also adopted by the New Zealand Court of Appeal: R. v. Ellis , [2011] NZCA 90, [2011] 4 L.R.C. 515, at paras. 50-60. I recognize that discrimination may occur not only as the result of intended effects of conduct, but a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-4, October 2011
    • 1 October 2011
    ...(Duke IV) No.04-16688(9th Cir Apr 26,2010) . . . . . . . . . 118Dupas vR [2010] HCA20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84Ellis vR [2011] NZCA90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002]EWCA Civ605, [2002] 1WLR 2409 . . . . . . . 354Entick v C......
  • In a Constitutional State: Magna Carta in New Zealand 1840-2015
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 21-2015, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...Gregory v Gollan [2009] NZSC 29[3] referring to s 19A of the Judicature Act 1908. 45 Criminal Justice Act 1948(UK) s 30(2). 46 Ellis v R [2011] 4 LRC 515, 526[34](NZ CA) this proposition was accepted on appeal: [2011] NZSC 60[4]. supersedes anything said in Magna Carta. 47 The court referre......
  • Case Commentaries
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-3, July 2011
    • 1 July 2011
    ...jury is most likely to be representative and a representative jury is most likely to be impartial. (at 7) The appellant in Ellis v R [2011] NZCA 90 complained that he had not received fair trial to which he was entitled under s. 25(a) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 because he had be......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT