R v Fatu and Ekeroma
| Judgment Date | 31 July 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] NZHC 1893 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Ekeroma v R
...was in error. Result 40 An extension of time to bring the appeal is granted. 41 The appeal against sentence is dismissed. 1 R v Fatu [2020] NZHC 1893. 2 Mr Cordwell also initially suggested that a discount for good character could have been applied. When his attention was drawn to Mr Ekerom......
-
R v Tregidga
...I repeat, you did not need to go to Whenuapai. 14 15 Cigarettes used to burn Mr D’s eyelids, but also feet as weapons – compare R v Fatu [2020] NZHC 1893 at [29]: “feet as weapons”, citing Waipuka v R [2013] NZCA 661 at R v Taueki, above n 7, at [34]. [35] I agree with the Crown that a star......
-
R v Sua
...of weapons, level of violence, premeditation, multiple offenders, home invasion, victim impact, detention of partner. At [22]. R v Fatu [2020] NZHC 1893; and R v Ekeroma [2021] NZCA Jeremiah, you are the President of the Mongrel Mob Aotearoa Manawatu Chapter. You are described by Mariota as......
-
Ekeroma v R
...of 12 years’ imprisonment for sentence. He considered, but did not apply, an uplift for Mr Ekeroma’s previous convictions for 1 R v Fatu [2020] NZHC 1893. violence. The Judge then assessed the discount for mitigating factors in the He took into account Mr Ekeroma’s offer at a relatively ear......