R v Sungsuwan
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] NZSC 57 |
| Date | 2005 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
283 cases
-
Jesse-James Winter v R
...Kingdom reflects the language in the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (UK), s 2(1)(a). 130 See above at [80]. 131 Further, as this Court noted in R v Sungsuwan [2005] NZSC 57, [2006] 1 NZLR 730 there will be “rare cases, … where the conduct of counsel, although reasonable in the circumstances in w......
-
Nudd v R
...verdict may still be the product of a miscarriage of justice if the process through which that verdict was reached was unfair.’ 97 In Sungsuwan v The Queen139, the Supreme Court of New Zealand likewise identified a distinction between cases where errors or irregularities in the trial, occas......
-
Balfour and Balfour v R
...12 September 2006 at [18]; R v Collins, above n 29, at [18]; Prowse v Police HC Hamilton CRI-2011-419-65, 15 December 2011 at [33]-[35]; R v Sungsuwan [2005] NZSC 57, [2006] 1 NZLR 730 at 34 Pre-trial ruling, above n 11, at [137]. 35 At [130]-[134]. 36 AWA, s 127(5). Compare s 133(1)(e). 3......
-
Lundy v The Queen
...or not, then it must of necessity consider the conviction unsafe" 148 This is also in accord with the approach adopted by Tipping J in R Sungsuwan [2006] 1 NZLR 730 where he said at para 110: "[110] … Ordinarily two things must be shown. First, something must have gone wrong with the trial ......
Request a trial to view additional results