R v Uljee

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1982
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • B v Auckland District Law Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 19 May 2003
    ...to discovery in the original action" (emphasis added). 43 The same rationale is seen as underlying the doctrine in New Zealand today. In R v Uljee [1982] 1 NZLR 561, 572 Richardson J said: "For the focus of the solicitor and client privilege is not on the conduct of third parties at all. It......
  • Gelatissimo Ventures (S) Pte Ltd and Others v Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 October 2009
    ...Australian High Court in Baker v Campbell 49 ALR 385 had refused to apply Calcraft, while the New Zealand Court of Appeal in R v Uljee [1982] 1 NZLR 561 had stated clearly that it did not regard Calcraft as standing for the proposition that secondary evidence of privileged documents was 23 ......
  • Shell E & P Ireland Ltd v McGrath (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 December 2006
    ...v BANK OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 1876 3 CH D 644 BOLTON v LIVERPOOL CORPORATION 1833 1 M & K 88 HOLMES v BADDLEY 1844 1 PH 476 R v ULJEE 1982 1 NZLR 561 GALLAGHER v STANLEY & NATIONAL MATERNITY HOSPITAL 1988 2 IR 267 MURPHY v KIRWAN 1993 3 IR 501 1994 1 ILRM 293 BULA LTD v CROWLEY (NO 2) 1994 ......
  • General Mediterranean Holdings SA v Patel and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 19 July 1999
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT