Rutherford v Attorney General

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Mobil Oil Hong Kong Ltd. And Another v Hong Kong United Dockyards Ltd.
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 2 November 1988
    ...proximity basis [Yuen Kun Yeu v AG of Hong Kong at p 193] in relation to which, as Cooke J pointed out in Rutherford v Attorney General [1976] 1 NZLR 403 at p 411, guidelines and "control mechanisms" are available. The relevance of non-feasance as opposed to misfeasance, emphasise......
  • Mobil Oil Hong Kong Ltd. And Another v Hong Kong United Dockyards Ltd.
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 2 November 1988
    ...proximity basis [Yuen Kun Yeu v AG of Hong Kong at p 193] in relation to which, as Cooke J pointed out in Rutherford v Attorney General [1976] 1 NZLR 403 at p 411, guidelines and "control mechanisms" are available. The relevance of non-feasance as opposed to misfeasance, emphasise......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT