Siemer v New Zealand Law Society
| Judgment Date | 25 November 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] NZHC 3075 |
| Date | 25 November 2019 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
ATTORNEY-GENERAL v Siemer
...expiry of vexatious litigant orders under the Judicature Act 1908: see Rafiq v Whata [2019] NZHC 1193; Siemer v New Zealand Law Society [2019] NZHC 3075; and Siemer v Auckland High Court [2019] NZHC 3393. However, under all possible interpretations the order is now 166 Judge may make order ......
-
Siemer v Auckland High Court
...Documents) Rules 2017, r 14(a). Rule 14(a). Siemer v Attorney-General [2016] NZCA 43, [2016] NZAR 411. Siemer v New Zealand Law Society [2019] NZHC 3075. Re Rafiq, above n Mr Siemer’s earlier prohibition was made under s 88B of the Judicature Act 1908. “clear on the face” of the judgment.14......
-
Siemer v Auckland High Court
...minute of 28 February 2020 constitute a judgment, decree or order. The very point of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 See Siemer v New Zealand Law Society [2019] NZHC 3075 at [28] and Siemer v Auckland Court [2019] NZHC 3393 at [11]. See Re Siemer [2020] NZCA 393 at [8] and footnote 4 where the Court of Appea......
-
Slavich v ATTORNEY-GENERAL
...Court authorities.4 3 4 The relevant authorities were reviewed in Herron v Wallace [2016] NZHC 2426. Siemer v New Zealand Law Society [2019] NZHC 3075; Siemer v Auckland High Court NZHC 3393; and Rafiq v Whata J [2019] NZHC 1193. [14] It is an important issue. However, we consider it better......
Request a trial to view additional results