Smith v Smith
| Judgment Date | 19 December 2018 |
| Neutral Citation | [2018] NZHC 3405 |
| Date | 19 December 2018 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Smith v Smith
...the hope he might regain ownership of the former family home which was vested in Ms Smith by the settlement. 1 2 3 4 Smith v Smith [2018] NZHC 3405 [Substantive decision]; and Smith v Smith [2019] NZHC 320 [Costs Costs decision, above n 1, at [26]. The marriage was dissolved in March 2018. ......
-
Smith v Smith
...2018, I found that four of the transactions constituted deliberate breaches of the order and amounted to contempt:1 1 Smith v Smith [2018] NZHC 3405. (a) One transaction (a $21.30 purchase of cigarettes) I did not take into account on the basis “de minimis non curat One transaction had been......
-
Smith v Smith
...this approach, Ms Smith opposes the application for an extension of time to appeal the substantive judgment. She says: 1 2 Smith v Smith [2018] NZHC 3405 [substantive Smith v Smith [2019] NZHC 320 [costs judgment]. (a) Mr Smith has not properly explained his failure to file a notice of appe......
-
R v L
...NZCA 188, [2012] 3 NZLR 43 at [95]-[96]. McAllister v Solicitor-General [2013] NZHC 2217, [2013] 3 NZLR 708 at [45]-[46]. Smith v Smith [2018] NZHC 3405 at As to this, Mr Perkins sets out a number of mitigating factors which he says I should take into account in setting the appropriate pena......