Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays and Others (The "Tasman Pioneer")
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] NZCA 135 |
| Year | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Glencore Energy UK Ltd and another v Freeport Holdings Ltd
... ... a:visited,#outline a:hover,#outline a:active{line ... , Mango & CoLtd [ 1932 ]A C 328 , HL(E) Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays (The ... bunkers and thereby against (amongst others) the claimants and the defendant. 9 ... The ... CV v New Zealand China Clays (The Tasman Pioneer) [ 2010 ] 2 Lloyds Rep 13 the Supreme Court ... ...
-
Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Ltd and Others SC
... ... JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ... REASONS ... (Given by Wilson J ) ... Introduction ... 1 On 3 May 2001 the Tasman Pioneer , a Cypriot-registered vessel of 16,748 gross tonnes under sub-charter to the appellant, was on a voyage from Yokohama in Japan to Busan 1 in South Korea. Because he was behind schedule, the Master (Captain Hernandez) decided to pass through a narrow channel between Biro Shima Island and the ... ...
-
Tasman Orient Line Cv v New Zealand China Clays Limited and
...COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA519/2007 [2009] NZCA 135 BETWEEN TASMAN ORIENT LINE CV Appellant AND NEW ZEALAND CHINA CLAYS LIMITED First Respondent AND IMERYS MINERALS JAPAN KK Second Respondent AND NEW ZEALAND DAIRY BOARD Third Respondent And Cross-Appellant AND NESTLE KOREA LIMITED Fou......
1 books & journal articles
-
Tasman Orient Line CV v NZ China Clays Ltd & Ors (The 'Tasman Pioneer') [2009] NZCA 135
...ORIENT LINE CV v NZ CHINA CLAYS LTD & ORS (THE TASMAN PIONEER) [2009] NZCA 135 Gra c e Ripping a le ∗ The Tasman Pioneer concerned the interpretation of article 4 rule 2(a) of the Hague Visby Rules (the Rules), which provides the carrier with an exemption for damage arising from ‘act, negle......