Treaty of Waitangi (Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act 1992
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Citation | 1992 No 121 |
| Reference | 1992 No 121 |
| Record Number | DLM281432 |
| Act Number | 121 |
| Type of Document | Act |
An Act—ato give effect to the settlement of claims relating to Maori fishing rights; andbto make better provision for Maori non-commercial traditional and customary fishing rights and interests; and cto make better provision for Maori participation in the management and conservation of New Zealand’s fisheries
Whereas—aby the Treaty of Waitangi the Crown confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs, tribes, and individual Maori full exclusive and undisturbed possession and te tino rangatiratanga of their fisheries; andbsection 88(2) of the Fisheries Act 1983 provides that nothing in that Act shall affect any Maori fishing rights; andcthere has been uncertainty and dispute between the Crown and Maori as to the nature and extent of Maori fishing rights in the modern context and as to whether they derive from the Treaty or common law or both (such as by customary law or aboriginal title or otherwise) and as to the import of section 88(2) of the Fisheries Act 1983 and its predecessors; anddMaori have claimed in proceedings in the High Court and in various claims to the Waitangi Tribunal that the quota management system introduced by the Fisheries Amendment Act 1986 is unlawful and in breach of the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, or has no application to Maori fisheries (including commercial fisheries), and have obtained from the High Court and Court of Appeal, by way of interim relief, a declaration declaring that the Crown ought not take further steps to bring the fisheries within the quota management system; andeat a national hui held at Wellington in June 1988 the Maori principals were given a mandate by Maori claiming rights and interests in the fisheries of New Zealand to secure a just and honourable settlement of their claims with the Crown; andfthe Maori Fisheries Act 1989, an Act to make better provision for the recognition of Maori fishing rights secured by the Treaty of Waitangi (which came into force on 20 December 1989) provides for the transfer from the Crown to the Maori Fisheries Commission of quota totalling 10% of the total allowable commercial catches for all species then subject to the quota management system (which transfer was required to be effected in instalments over the period ending with the close of 31 October 1992); andgon 27 February 1990, the Crown and Maori agreed that there should be discussions between them to ensure that the evolution of the quota management system, including the term of quota, met both conservation requirements and the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and further agreed that all substantive court proceedings should stand adjourned sine die to allow discussions to continue, and the Crown agreed that no further species would be brought within the quota management system pending agreement or court resolution; andhthere remain disputes between the Crown and Maori as to the nature and extent of Maori fishing rights and interests and their status, and the litigation between the plaintiffs and the Crown is still outstanding with interim declarations in relation to squid and paua and the Crown undertaking not to bring further species within the quota management system still in force; andion 26 and 27 August 1992, representatives of the Crown and Maori met to discuss their differences with a view to settling outstanding claims and Treaty grievances of Maori in relation to fisheries, and, therefore, the outstanding litigation; and, on 27 August 1992, agreement was reached on a proposal for settlement; andjthe Crown and Maori wish to resolve their disputes in relation to the fishing rights and interests and the quota management system and seek a just and honourable solution in conformity with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; andkthe Crown recognises that traditional fisheries are of importance to Maori and that the Crown's Treaty duty is to develop policies to help recognise use and management practices and provide protection for and scope for exercise of rangatiratanga in respect of traditional fisheries; andla deed dated 23 September 1992 was entered into between the Crown and Sir Graham Latimer, the Honourable Matiu Rata, Richard Dargaville, Tipene O'Regan, Cletus Maanu Paul, and Whatarangi Winiata, together with other persons who have negotiated with the Crown on behalf of iwi, the New Zealand Maori Council, the National Maori Congress, and other representatives of iwi, whereby it was agreed between the parties that—iMaori would enter into a joint venture with Brierley Investments Limited to acquire Sealord Products Limited, a major fishing company; andiithe Crown would pay to Maori a sum of $150 million to be used for the development and involvement of Maori in the New Zealand fishing industry, including participation in the acquisition of Sealord Products Limited; andiiithe Crown would introduce legislation to ensure that Maori were allocated 20% of all quota for species henceforth brought within the quota management system; andivthe Crown would introduce legislation empowering the making of regulations recognising and providing for customary food gathering and the special relationship between the tangata whenua and places of importance for customary food gathering (including tauranga ika and mahinga mataitai), to the extent that such food gathering is not commercial in any way nor involves commercial gain or trade; andvthe Crown would introduce legislation to reconstitute the Maori Fisheries Commission as the Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission; andvithe Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission would consider the resolutions in respect of the assets held by the Commission at the settlement date specified in the deed, as adopted by the Annual General Meeting of the Commission on 25 July 1992, and consider how best to give effect to the resolutions, and would be empowered to allocate those assets; andviifollowing consultation with Maori, the Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission would devise and report to the Crown on a scheme for the distribution of the Commission's assets other than those referred to in subparagraph (vi); andviiithe...
To continue reading
Request your trial