Vakapora v Police
| Judgment Date | 18 March 2022 |
| Neutral Citation | [2022] NZHC 493 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Mason v NZ Police
...250. Tutakangahau v R [2014] NZCA 279, [2014] 3 NZLR 482 at [30]–[31]. At [36]. Relying on R v Tarau [2018] NZHC 2595. Vakapora v Police [2022] NZHC 493. their position that the correct approach is that taken in Tarau (that is, doubling the time spent on remand, deducting it from the senten......
-
R v Uhatafe
...remand for a discount of home detention. I adopt the approach of Simon France J in Longman. See for divergent views: Vakapora v Police [2022] NZHC 493; Wharrie v R [2019] NZHC 633; Diaz v R [2021] NZHC 426; and Bracken v R [2022] NZHC been because of the seven months you have already spent ......
-
Black v R
...25 26 27 28 Longman v Police [2017] NZHC 2928. Mason v Police [2022] NZHC 1845. Longman v Police, above n 24, at [9]. Vakapora v Police [2022] NZHC 493. Mason v Police, above n 25, at remanded in custody on the length of a sentence of home detention is an evaluative exercise; and that the “......
-
Richardson v R
...twice as long. A commonly adopted approach is therefore to deduct double the period spent in custodial 2 3 Vakapora v New Zealand Police [2022] NZHC 493 at Parole Act 2002, s 86(1). remand from the end sentence of imprisonment. The period then remaining is converted to a sentence of home de......
Request a trial to view additional results