X v M
| Judgment Date | 18 June 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] NZHC 1377 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
So v Drumm
...before ultimately declining the 29 30 31 32 At [42]. M and D v S, above n 28, at [47]. M and D v S, above n 28, at [91(e)]. X v M [2020] NZHC 1377. father’s application.33 That is an issue to which I will return when discussing Mr Cullen’s Having considered the evidence,34 I cannot be satis......
-
X v M
...in determining such an application remain, however, those applied in relation to the predecessor to s 60, s 67 of the 1 2 3 4 X v M [2020] NZHC 1377. At At [15]–[21]. At [25]-[28]. Judicature Act 1908. In Waller v Hider, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the function of the Court of Appeal......
-
X (CA576/2020) v M
...in relation to both jurisdiction and the substantive claim.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 X v M [2018] NZDC 25280 [District Court decision]. X v M [2020] NZHC 1377 [High Court X v M [2020] NZHC 2614 [High Court leave decision]. Waller v Hider [1998] 1 NZLR 412 (CA) at 413; and Downer Construction (New Z......