Yusuke (david) Sena v New Zealand Police
| Judgment Date | 24 May 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] NZSC 55 |
| Date | 24 May 2019 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Yusuke (David) Sena v New Zealand Police
...Yusuke (David) Sena Appellant and New Zealand Police Respondent [2019] NZSC 55 William Young, Glazebrook, O'Regan Ellen France and Winkelmann JJ SC 60/2018 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI MANA NUI Criminal Procedure — appeal against conviction — appeals following trial on indi......
-
Huritu v New Zealand Police
...formulation in R v Sungsuwan [2005] NZSC 57, [2006] 1 NZLR 730 at [110], and [37]. Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 232(3). Sena v Police [2019] NZSC 55 at Evidence Act 2006, s 16(2)(d) (definition of ‘unavailable as a witness’). significant effort to locate her on that second occasion, befor......
-
Mackisack v NZ Police
...on appeal. 9 The error must be adequately significant for the appeal to be allowed — although the Criminal 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sena v Police [2019] NZSC 55, [2019] 1 NZLR 575 at Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Stichting Lodestar [2007] NZSC 103, [2008] 2 NZLR 141 at [5] and [13]; and Kueh v R [2013] NZC......
-
Stewart v New Zealand Police
...issues. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 232(2). Section 232(4). R v Sungsuwan [2006] 1 NZLR 730 (SC) at [110]. Sena v Police [2019] NZSC 55 at [32]; and Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Stichting Lodestar NZSC 103, [2008] 2 NZLR 141. At [38]. At [38]–[40]. [23] Although there was some......
Request a trial to view additional results