Couch v The Attorney-General
Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
Judge | Elias CJ,Blanchard J,Tipping J,McGrath J,Wilson J |
Judgment Date | 24 March 2010 |
Neutral Citation | [2010] NZSC 27 |
Court | Supreme Court |
Docket Number | SC 49/2006 |
Date | 24 March 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
61 cases
-
Couch v The
...SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 49/2006 [2010] NZSC 27 BETWEEN SUSAN COUCH Appellant AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL Respondent Hearing: 23 March 2009 Court: Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Wilson JJ Counsel: B P Henry for Appellant D B Collins QC Solicitor-General, J C Pike and R Kirkne......
-
ATTORNEY-GENERAL v Strathboss Kiwifruit Limited
...judgment (being the relevant pre-border and border personnel). Mr Hodder 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 See Couch v Attorney-General (No 2) [2010] NZSC 27, [2010] 3 NZLR 149 [Couch (No State Sector Amendment Act 2013, s 62(4). High Court judgment, above n 2, at [1356]. Couch (No 2), above n 11......
-
Ann Thomson (ap) V. The Scottish Ministers
... ... ] PNLR 87, K v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 775, State of New South Wales v Godfrey [2004] NSWCA 113 and Couch v Attorney General [2008] 3 NZLR 725. In that regard there was a need to establish proximity in addition to foreseeability. For there to be a duty ... ...
-
C v Holland HC
...constitutional arrangements are so different that Ontarians should be afforded greater 116 117 At 7.18. Couch v Attorney-General (No 2) [2010] NZSC 27, [2010] 3 NZLR protection than New Zealanders from unwanted intrusions into their privacy. Furthermore it has been said by Professor Dianne ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...[2000] NBJ No 532 (Sm Cl Ct) .................................................................... 125 Susan Couch v Attorney General, [2010] NZSC 27 ....................................331, 336 Suveges v Martens, [2000] BCJ No 1037, 2000 BCSC 810 ..................136, 140, 197 Sweetland v ......
-
Punitive Damages
...154 NSR (2d) 161 (CA) [ Hollett ]. 51 (2006), 83 OR (3d) 161 (CA) [ McIntyre ]. 52 Ibid at para 57. 53 Susan Couch v Attorney General , [2010] NZSC 27 [ Susan Couch ]. R EMEDIES: THE LAW OF DAMAGES 332 at the plaintiff, rather than conduct aimed at a class of people. 54 Thus, where the gist......
-
Police, Negligence and the Elusive Special Ingredient: A critical analysis of Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police and the liability of police for the actions of third parties
...Thomas Reuters, Wellington, 2016) 277 at 360. 245 Tobin and Mandrey, above n 187, at 206–207. 246 At 212. 247 Couch v Attorney-General [2010] NZSC 27, [2010] 3 NZLR 149 at [179]. 134 Canterbury Law Review [Vol 24, 2018] It is unlikely that a New Zealand court would take an approach as restr......
-
Wrongful Birth or Wrongful Law: A critical analysis of the availability of child-rearing costs after failed sterilisation operations in New Zealand
...v Palmer CA83/98 [1998] NZCA 190; [1999] 1 NZLR 549. 65 At 10. 66 Donselaar v Donsellar [1982] 1 NZLR 81, Couch v Attorney-General [2010] NZSC 27, [2010] 3 NZLR 149. 67 Davies v Police [2009] NZSC 47, (2009) 24 CRNZ 644 at 652 per Elias CJ. 68 At 652. 10 Canterbury Law Review [Vol 24, 2018]......