A v Bottrill
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Roderick Cunningham v Attorney General for Jamaica and Others
... ... It is also made to act as deterrence against potential offenders. The Privy Council in A v Bottrill [2003] 1 A.C. 449 , on appeal from the New Zealand Court of Appeal in a negligence suit (which was not concerned with the existence of the jurisdiction to make the award but rather with its outer limits), approved the test of outrageousness as the applicable test in New Zealand. The majority noted ... ...
-
Couch v The Attorney-General
...Probation Service and Couch — consideration of the test of exemplary damages — whether the test for negligence and exemplary damages under Bottrill v A should be retained Counsel: B P Henry for D B Collins QC Solicitor-General, J C Pike and R Kirkness for Respondent A The appeal is allowed ......
- "A" v Michael Bernard Bottrill
- Turkyah Abdulrahman Assiri v Dr Seri Suniza Sufian