Steven Richard Paul Whiteford v R
| Judgment Date | 30 April 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] NZCA 130 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Daniel Clinton Fitzgerald v R
...for example, R v Verschaffelt [2002] 3 NZLR 772 (CA) at [22]–[31]; L (CA719/2017) v R [2019] NZCA 676 at [57]–[58]; and Whiteford v R [2020] NZCA 130 at [231] Accordingly, we conclude that, interpreted in accordance with Parliament’s direction in s 6 of the Bill of Rights, s 86D(2) does not......
-
William Allan Berkland v R
...for example, on the approaches to background factors in cases of commercial scale drug offending in the following cases: Whiteford v R [2020] NZCA 130; Roulston v R [2020] NZCA 255; Royal v R [2020] NZCA 129; Joyce v R [2020] NZCA 124; and Clark v R [2020] NZCA 96 R v Ipeelee 2012 SCC 13, [......
-
Daniel Clinton Fitzgerald v R
...for example, R v Verschaffelt [2002] 3 NZLR 772 (CA) at [22]–[31]; L (CA719/2017) v R [2019] NZCA 676 at [57]–[58]; and Whiteford v R [2020] NZCA 130 at [231] Accordingly, we conclude that, interpreted in accordance with Parliament’s direction in s 6 of the Bill of Rights, s 86D(2) does not......
-
R v Smith & ORS
...also sitting within band two of Zhang, thus justifying a similar starting point for the methamphetamine offending. Whiteford v R [2020] NZCA 130: In this case, a starting point of five years’ imprisonment was applied in relation to methamphetamine supply charges amounting to 53 grams. Mr Wh......
Request a trial to view additional results